Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Warden of Glasswall


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:03, 21 November 2005 (UTC)

The Warden of Glasswall
Vanity page, no real claim to notability, elaborate hoax, extensive joke, pick your favorite reason. -- malo (talk) 00:48, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as above. Ashibaka (tock) 00:55, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete along with the previous article. - Bobet 01:00, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as not-notable fiction. -- Antaeus Feldspar 01:33, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete if there is any good in you... save this brilliant peice of writing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AshJW (talk • contribs) 20:53, 14 November 2005
 * Dont Delete If indeed wikipedia is a centre of knowledge then it should do well to host such myth so that we may broaden our minds — Preceding unsigned comment added by M1thrand1r (talk • contribs) 20:56, 14 November 2005
 * Move Wikipedia has an appropriate place for the creation of group fictional projects.  I suggested this placement last month on The Swiss Knight's discussion page.  See below.   WBardwin 01:53, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Better yet -- why not transfer the Swiss Knight and associated pages into Once upon a time... - a project designed for writing "creative work" or "fiction." That quiet site has never really gotten off the ground, and your fine effort might create a spark there as well.  Best Wishes.  WBardwin 02:30, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

In My Defense Ill have all of you know, the swiss knight's legend merely crosses the path my own (and inspired its record) this is a tale unto its own. I lament for the knight as he laments for me. Alas that we should see such days where the legends of the old are burnt as heresy and nonsense.
 * Delete: Jokes are fine in user space, but not article space. Geogre 02:01, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
 * I will join the ranks of Dave the Malevolent and Chad the Scornful by voting Delete. Capitalistroadster 02:18, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as patent nonsense. Sweet mother of pearl! I mean, really... Ifnord 04:51, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per above. Dottore So 10:49, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Same garbage as The Swiss Knight. Descendall 12:18, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong delete for same reasons as The Swiss Knight. Smaller meatpuppet problem here, but still...  Wcquidditch &#124; &#91;&#91;User talk:Wcquidditch&#124;Talk]] 12:45, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, continuation of The Swiss Knight nonsense above. HGB 19:18, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Long-winded dumb jokes don't belong on Wikipedia. Jasmol 22:48, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is good stuff, just not Wikipedia-worthy. Mo0 [ talk ] 02:59, 16 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.