Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Warwick Files (thriller series)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:21, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

The Warwick Files (thriller series)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

These books are non-notable by every policy contained in WP:BOOK and WP:AUTHOR. Qworty (talk) 05:47, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:20, 20 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete either self-published or very nearly so. As far as I can tell, the "publisher" hasn't actually published anything else. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  16:23, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Agreed that likely self published. Some research reveals that the citation given is a thinly-veiled press release. Caseylf (talk) 01:06, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect to J.M. Hoffman. There's enough out there to suggest that as far as his non-fiction work goes, Hoffman is considered to be relatively notable. He's received a few reviews for that work, although the fictional work seems to have gotten no actual coverage. The author's article can use a lot of work, but as there's just enough to where I'd probably argue for a weak keep based on the current sources, I'd say that this could be a reasonable redirect to his page. However as a standalone article, the series is not notable in the slightest. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   09:17, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.