Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Water Travelers: Heir of the Unknown


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 00:55, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

The Water Travelers: Heir of the Unknown

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I have found no indication of coverage in reliable, independent sources for this book. A Google search turned up no usable sources. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 23:46, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. Article has no sources, no publication data,  and was written by the book's author. --Seduisant (talk) 02:48, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's not only non-notable, but it's also very, very closely paraphrased from the official book jacket. It could probably be speedied as copyvio, but at least this way we'll be able to G4 it if it gets re-added. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   05:34, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:16, 27 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Clearly fails notability. --Jersey92 (talk) 23:26, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG.  Jim Carter (from public cyber)  11:06, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - Non-notable author, lacks appropriate coverage, does poorly on the search engine test (WP:SET), and the best metric I can find for number of copies sold is its ranking on Amazon's bestsellers list, where it currently stands at 1.1 millionth. Upjav (talk) 18:58, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.