Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Way of Defender


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Arafel (band). NW ( Talk ) 03:11, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

The Way of Defender

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

non-notable album Jrtayloriv (talk) 22:51, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. I disagree, as the band has a fairly robust biography page and if that is considered notable, then per WP policy so are the albums. Doomsdayer520 (talk) 11:53, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  — J04n(talk page) 00:31, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence of notability. Only 209 Google hits when duplicates are eliminated, and nothing that amounts to substantial, second party coverage. I disagree with Doomsdayer520 that the band's page is "robust" - it is very poorly sourced, and has been tagged as such since March '08.  Dawn Bard (talk) 15:45, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  23:03, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete. No significant coverage found.--Michig (talk) 08:49, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I'd also be happy with a redirect to the band.--Michig (talk) 12:16, 12 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Arafel (band) no coverage by any WP:RS, not even mentioned in allmusic or Metal Hammer. J04n(talk page) 09:43, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.