Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Weather Channel internationally


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:17, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

The Weather Channel internationally

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This appears to be a cross between WP:OR and WP:ESSAY. I would suggest merge or redirect, however, there's really no sourced content here that isn't already replicated in the main article for the Weather Channel. And it seems unlikely anyone would search for the phrase "The Weather Channel internationally" so a redirect seems a waste of time. There have been unresolved citation tags (originally placed by Qwfp) on the article for exactly two years this month. Chetsford (talk) 07:43, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 10:13, 28 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Two concepts each lasted less than a year, the third example is 'theory thrown out at random' by someone who doesn't know how websites work, fourth is 'they owned a part of The Weather Network' and the fifth is 'um, I guess Fox copied this in Australia, probably?'. This is a bunch of fancruft badly disguised as an article (honestly this should have been PRODDED as being ill-formed; not an attack on the splitter who had good intentions, but it's up to others to bring this up to snuff after the split from the main article.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 01:11, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete -- unsourced original research on a non-encyclopedic topic: "... internationally"? No value to the project. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:48, 3 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.