Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Web Platform for the Language Industry


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 08:05, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

The Web Platform for the Language Industry

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Absolutely no independent sources, external links are to homepage, EU-sites, EU press releases, etc. Perhaps it will become notable in the future (it only exists since 1 year), but at this point, there's no way to know. Does not meet WP:GNG, hence: delete. Crusio (talk) 13:48, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:38, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:39, 17 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Not all sources are EU-related, such as Gala, Tekom. They should be considered independent 12:32, 18 October 2011 (UTC)vihonin — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vihonin (talk • contribs)
 * The "references" given are (in order of appearance): 1/ A dead link to TCworld; 2/ A short note on a website of unknown reliability (and possibly not independent); 3/ An interview with someone from the EU directorate in a newsletter of unclear reliability and independence; 4/ An EU press release; 5/ An abstract of a conference presentation by some project participants; 6/ A link to TCworld (but that page does not mention the title mentioned, nor does it turn up in a search). --Crusio (talk) 13:23, 18 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - Lacks coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 15:17, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - lacks independent sources. Stuartyeates (talk) 02:32, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.