Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Wedding (2013)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  11:34, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

The Wedding (2013)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seems to fail WP:NFILM bobrayner (talk) 23:28, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment: There's a possibility of hoaxing; bear in mind some of the creator's previous edits...   etc. bobrayner (talk) 00:01, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

I believe this article has a strong significance and should remain on wikipedia, I do not believe this article should be deleted. The film is a milestone in the progression of a university and will play big part in the guild celebration, Preston. The article will be frequently updated and added to as more infomation is available. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lwsriamu (talk • contribs) 00:04, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. The film is clearly not notable at this point in time. The article claims to be the "third ever feature film to be produced by students in the UK", which I doubt is true. There are always people who claim to be one of the first people to do something, but considering that there have been film students in the UK for years and years, I would think that at least someone somewhere (student-wise) has completed a feature film at some point in time for their degree or as a hobby. It's just that the film never got attention. All claims of that nature aside, being first at something only counts here on Wikipedia if it has received coverage in independent and reliable sources. Which this film hasn't. I can be the first American to read a book while watching a movie and setting my house on fire as I play eight instruments at once, but that only becomes notable if it has received coverage and is shown to be more than one event. There are no RS for the film and considering that on top of this the film doesn't appear to have really started filming yet (the fb page says they're still casting), this movie does not pass the notability standards for future films. We can't keep films because they might become notable and FYI, nothing that is released by the crew or anyone representing them will ever show notability because it's a WP:PRIMARY source.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 05:26, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 05:42, 20 November 2012 (UTC)


 * The claim that the film is the third ever is legitimate, it is in terms of module - not hobby. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lwsriamu (talk • contribs) 19:56, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
 * And again, I argue that the claim is dubious at best. I would wager that there have been other students that have made a feature film under the same situation. They just never gained any sort of coverage and didn't even get enough notice to say that they faded into obscurity. The article just claims that it was made by UK students. I'd say that it's highly likely that other UK students have made films. It's not like these guys are the first students in the UK to own a video camera, after all.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 21:06, 25 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - No coverage in reliable sources. The claim for third student feature film may or may not be legitimate, but is ultimately irrelevant to whether this article is kept. -- Whpq (talk) 18:50, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as lacking solid independent sourcing. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:10, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.