Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Whispering Woods


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 11:54, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

The Whispering Woods

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

There is a no reliable third person sources and lacks notability Dwanyewest (talk) 19:58, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 *  merge adequately     the  information is verifiable,   being based as it should be on the fiction itself, & is therefore not Original Research.     DGG ( talk ) 06:11, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. "It exists" (or in this case, "It does not exist, except in fiction") is not a valid argument.  If there are no third party sources on this subject it must go, we are not Triviapedia.   JBsupreme  ( talk ) 06:41, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:20, 19 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:10, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator and JBSupreme. This article has no independent sources, which are required for an article to exist. Reyk  YO!  03:18, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,   A rbitrarily 0    ( talk ) 00:14, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Article is well done, plenty of valid information to fill it. The suggested guidelines are not binding in any way.  Policies are all that matters.  Ignore all rules clearly states if a rule gets in the way of improving Wikipedia, you ignore it.  All guidelines were done by a small number of people, usually less than a handful at a time, without the rest of the Wikipedia noticing, and can't really be taken seriously.  Note, am now copying this to several AFD, which are the same, nominated by the same person, with the same invalid argument about mindlessly following the guidelines passed by deletionists campers as an excuse to get rid of things they personally don't like.   D r e a m Focus  07:48, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Comment - this is listed for rescue, but if someone's going to work on it, it won't be me, as I just spent an hour working on Rihanna 2006 Tour. Otherwise, merge. Bearian (talk) 03:01, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete A search for sources produced no significant coverage at all, let alone from reliable sources, article is not verified and the subject certainly hasn't been demonstrated to be notable, which is highly unlikely since most individual aspects of fictional settings aren't. I would support a merge or redirect to Etheria (She-Ra), effectively this article's parent, but it's in no better condition, state of compliance or relevance. That She-Ra and co. live in a wood on a planet twinned with He-Man's stomping ground is something that can be summed up in a sentence or two on the main article. Another reason I'm not leaping on the redirect option is that the term 'whispering woods' is hardly limited to She-Ra, run it through Amazon.. Someoneanother 19:45, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete or Redirect to Etheria (She-Ra). This is not a notable topic, and I doubt there's any content worth merging. Robofish (talk) 23:45, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.