Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Wild Rings (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 19:01, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

The Wild Rings
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Just like has said, this video game fails WP:GNG for lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. I have removed Giant Bomb and GameFaq as references since both are unreliable to use as citations per WP:VG/RS (in Giant Bomb's case says "Do not use the user-contributed content from the site's wikis for citations"). Not able to find any WP:SIGCOV of the subject in reliable sources besides a paragraph on IGN pre-release. Neoseeker reference is just an entry, and may also be unreliable per Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Video_games/Sources/Archive_21. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 17:21, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 17:21, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 17:42, 10 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Not notable. --MrClog (talk) 17:57, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Month Keep we are giving sources. Benjaminkirsc (talk) 10:06, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
 * I have no idea as to what a "Month Keep" or your post means, so a clarification would be nice. I would recommend the closer to ignore this if not as it's not based in any guidelines or policies nor it is a coherent comment. Not to mention "we" is used which could mean WP:COI. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 10:19, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Okay, a month keep is you keep it for a month Benjaminkirsc (talk) 10:23, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
 * And the reason is? The first AFD ended in a no consensus and lasted almost a whole month. Sources have not been found. Sorry, I will assume WP:AGF but this doesn't make any sense. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 10:25, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
 * in fact maybe it should be Delete. Benjaminkirsc (talk) 10:27, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
 * There's no such thing as a month keep. Either there are sources, or there isn't. They don't neccesarily need to be in the article, the subject is either notable or not, not the article. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 08:24, 14 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Soft Delete - With this being a Japanese release, it's possible there is some Jap print/internet sources out there which can point towards notability. Found nothing in English sources, however. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 08:24, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - according to WP:NVIDEOGAMES, "A video game is appropriate for an article if it has been the subject of significant commentary or analysis in published sources that are independent of the game developer."- this game has not won any awards or achieved any notability - therefore, delete - Epinoia (talk) 17:05, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Avoid citing an essay as the primary justification in a deletion discussion. Citing the WP:GNG would be just as appropriate in this context. --Izno (talk) 17:03, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. fails WP:GNG- -MA Javadi (talk) 17:41, 17 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.