Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Witches (2008 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. WjBscribe 03:13, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

The Witches (2008 film)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

hoax, faked poster, all speculation. ThuranX 01:24, 11 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. I don't believe in witches. They do not exist.  I do not believe in movies that do not exist about witches that do not exist.  Qworty 02:14, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as crystalballery. It's all rumors at this point.  No prejudice to recreation if more information comes about.  -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 02:24, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
 * delete, WP:CRYSTAL. Unfortunately, not much content here to begin with. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 03:10, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above, whether hoax or crystalballery. Doczilla 07:52, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per above. ~ Magnus animum  ∵ ∫ φ γ 11:55, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above, either hoax or crystalballery. Burntsauce 16:42, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
 * comment it is my understanding that the proper term was "crystallballification". Did someone tell me wrong? AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 21:22, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I do not believe in crystalballificationism. ---Charles 23:03, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Ah. You're an anticrystallballificationalist? Is there a userbox for that? AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 02:45, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh goodness, I hope so! If not, and I knew how, I would make one myself. ---Charles 04:07, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I believe there is a project for such things, no? ZZ 04:11, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Aaahhh... good to know. Thanks! ---Charles 04:39, 12 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. Even a year out from release, there would be some press coverage, and thus some sources upon which to base an article. Here, nit. ZZ 04:11, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, no evidence that this exists in any shape or form. RFerreira 04:57, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. As much as I loved the movie as a kid and hope this is true, there just isn't enough information and only rumors at this point. --pIrish talk, contribs 20:40, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.