Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Wizard of Oz (arcade game)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. The keep arguments are surprisingly weak, but the participation in favor of delete is too small to call it the other way. RL0919 (talk) 14:05, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

The Wizard of Oz (arcade game)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not a notable topic. The game's creator (Elaut Belgium) is not notable for a Wikipedia article, making an article about its games having less possible notability. Also, Elaut has other variations of a very similar coin pusher type game. 𝕒𝕥𝕠𝕞𝕚𝕔𝕕𝕣𝕒𝕘𝕠𝕟𝟙𝟛𝟞 🗨️ 🖊️ 04:13, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:56, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. Article has plenty of sources. Miter128 (talk) 10:16, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
 * I see this as not having very many sources. Other than the article from The Press of Atlantic City, all the other sources are from the manufacturer’s websites. — 𝕒𝕥𝕠𝕞𝕚𝕔𝕕𝕣𝕒𝕘𝕠𝕟𝟙𝟛𝟞 🗨️ 🖊️ 02:31, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. AeroSpy7 (talk) 10:19, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep, per sourced coverage by The Press of Atlantic City. Randy Kryn (talk) 14:58, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete sock-created but updated by others, this article features only GNG-qualifying source at the moment, the good Press of Atlantic City article. All other sources are from the manufacturer's website which is a bit of a backdoor WP:PROMO issue as well and is most decidedly not "plenty of sources." SportingFlyer  T · C  06:26, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per sources. 63.116.111.186 (talk) 23:19, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Coffee //  have a ☕️ //  beans  // 05:25, 16 December 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Keep arguments say there are sources, so could someone give an independent reliable source other than the one local newspaper mentioned?
 * Keep - the article does have sources, as people above have said, and a Google search for "Wizard of Oz (Arcade game)" does throw up entries. Vorbee (talk) 07:40, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per the reliable sources. GNG Lightburst (talk) 02:33, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 14:03, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment my delete !vote stands. I just did a thorough before search and the only article that I would !vote keep on is already in the article. The fact all but one of the sources are primary and sourced to the manufacturer continue to make this article promotional. Frustrated none of the keep !votes have demonstrated any further coverage apart from a single article. SportingFlyer  T · C  21:32, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
 * I do want to point out again that the only source in the article is the Press of Atlantic City article, others are from the manufacturer’s website. I think a lot of people in this discussion are missing this point as many people voting keep are mentioning plenty of sources. — 𝕒𝕥𝕠𝕞𝕚𝕔𝕕𝕣𝕒𝕘𝕠𝕟𝟙𝟛𝟞 🗨️ 🖊️ 18:40, 25 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.