Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Woman's Eye


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:01, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

The Woman's Eye

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This doesn't meet WP:NOTABILITY. Bringing to AfD as I may have missed something in translation. Boleyn (talk) 17:53, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:41, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:41, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:27, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:27, 29 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment. I imagine that the title of the article is a nonce translation of Kadın gözüyle fotoğraf or similar. There are a lot of ghits for Kadın gözüyle fotoğraf, but unfortunately I can't read Turkish and therefore am reluctant to evaluate them. -- Hoary (talk) 01:04, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. There are no RS about this subject whatsoever. Comment. No particular judgement, but the sourcing seems to be insufficient to establish notability. My very best wishes (talk) 02:17, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
 * So this, for example, is not a reliable source? -- Hoary (talk) 03:19, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
 * This is probably an OK source, but it only tells this group of women photographers made an exhibition. Please provide in-line citation to several RS on the page, with translation of source names and titles to English, so it will be clear they are good sources and what they say. Otherwise, this page will probably be deleted. My very best wishes (talk) 17:44, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   12:00, 7 March 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  NASCARfan0548  ↗  02:37, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. The entirety of the article is what the group is and does. Without any information about how the work has been received, the impact it has had, or lasting external coverage, there is no evidence of notability. Sjakkalle (Check!)  09:08, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak delete Lacks inline WP:RS. Topic is potentially notable, so I'd happily reconsider if more sources are found. Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 11:58, 24 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.