Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Woodsman (soundtrack)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. I leave it to Axiloxos do to the necessary renaming  DGG ( talk ) 17:37, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

The Woodsman (soundtrack)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable soundtrack. The 2 sources added while this article was deprodded do not establish notability. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 23:52, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep, rename, refocus. The play itself has received considerable acclaim and an Obie Award and is surely notable.  .  This Wikipedia article started on the wrong foot, both in its focus and wording, but a substantial portion of the information now contained in the article (including the track listing) could be readily repurposed for an article about the play. --Arxiloxos (talk) 01:37, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:57, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:22, 3 September 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:55, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment. An album consisting of the music from a stage play should be described as a "cast recording", not a "soundtrack". See Cast recording. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:32, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep given the reviews which at least establish substance, but this will seriously need to be refocused as the play's own article, not the soundtrack. SwisterTwister   talk  05:55, 18 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.