Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Word Exposed with Archbishop Chito Tagle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Chito Tagle. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 19:00, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

The Word Exposed with Archbishop Chito Tagle

 * – ( View AfD View log )

a couple of blogs (one blogspot I removed as ref) and facebook when searching. Not notable. Dennis Brown (talk) 03:03, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails GNG. SpeakFree (talk)(contribs) 18:35, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 20:33, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 20:33, 12 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep shows aired on national television networks are presumed notable. Given that this is a Philippine network, I'm not satisfied that a simple Google search is sufficient to evaluate potential Tagalog sources. Jclemens (talk) 21:42, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm open minded, I would love to see the section in WP:N where it says that. Dennis Brown (talk) 22:21, 12 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Redirect; the Archbishop Chito Tagle is notable (IMHO), but the show does not appear to be independently notable. Therefore, I believe the content, that is supported by a third part reliable source should be merged into the article about the Archbishop and a redirect left in this namespace. If it expands sufficiently, and the article regarding the Archbishop grows, then per WP:ARTICLESIZE it can be spunout. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 02:07, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm more inclined to vote for a redirect or merge because while the TV show does exist and is shown on national television (was able to catch it outside of Metro Manila), I don't think it might have more information that would give the topic an article of its own. It does, however, fit well within the article about Archbishop Tagle, so including all the information on this TV show's article to the Archbishop's article should not be an issue. --- Tito Pao (talk) 00:55, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Archbishop Chito Tagle for now per RightCowLeftCoast.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 02:29, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Wifione  Message 20:07, 19 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge to Chito Tagle He is notable, but his show isn't that notable (yet). Maybe mention it in his article instead. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 13:06, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect and merge to Luis Antonio Tagle. While the TV show is worth mentioning in the context of the bishop's article, there is no real reason for it to have its own article. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 12:32, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.