Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The World's Most Beautiful Transsexual Contest (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Daniel (talk) 22:55, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

The World's Most Beautiful Transsexual Contest
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Subject does not appear to meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of independent WP:SIGCOV. A 2006 AfD closed as no consensus but notability thresholds have changed significantly since then. Let&#39;srun (talk) 19:47, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Women, Beauty pageants,  and Nevada. Let&#39;srun (talk) 19:47, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: the only news coverage I could find was a cursory mention in Las Vegas Weekly, which is hardly a RS to begin with. Owen&times; &#9742;  20:08, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:59, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: It was held once, 20 yrs ago, and nothing has appeared since. That Las Vegas Weekly article is the only coverage there is. Not enough coverage for notability. Oaktree b (talk) 21:02, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
 * I found this using ProQuest. It's quite long, but manages to say very little about the actual pageant. Unless something more surfaces, it'll have to be a delete from me.
 * Padgett, S. (2004, Jul 29). ONE-OF-A-KIND CONTEST: Head-turners: [final edition]. Las Vegas Review - Journal Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/newspapers/one-kind-contest-head-turners/docview/260152880/se-2
 * -- Maddy from Celeste (WAVEDASH) 21:58, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Good find, but we'd need one more like that (at least) for it to be a !keep from me. Oaktree b (talk) 22:46, 3 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete The source linked above provides not a whole lot of coverage and is from a local news outlet (Las Vegas Review-Journal), which could indicate it's just routine coverage, but maybe not. If there was more coverage, even from local sources, I would not be opposed to keeping it. Waddles 🗩 🖉 23:08, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. No GNG, not notable topic. बिनोद थारू (talk) 19:41, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: per nom -- Devoke water  22:26, 10 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.