Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Wynnewood Institute


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 16:38, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

The Wynnewood Institute

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable institution. Provided sources do not demonstrate notability (See: Notability (organizations and companies)). MargaretRDonald (talk) 03:54, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2018 November 8.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 04:20, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 04:30, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 04:30, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 04:30, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 04:30, 8 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete. I searched this Institute pretty thoroughly in news archives and other searches during Articles for deletion/Thomas Patrick Burke, founder of the Institute. As I wrote there, I found little beyond events listings for a lecture series in 2007.  No notability found, fails WP:SIGCOV.  Thanks to User:MargaretRDonald for her work at the other AfD and for bringing this page to AfD.E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:34, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
 *  Delete  There is no evidence that this "institute" is currently teaching; has any students or staff apart from Thomas Patrick Burke, or conducts or publishes research. MargaretRDonald (talk) 12:08, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
 * User:MargaretRDonald, I am sure you commented in good faith, nevertheless, just fyi: nominating an article is regarded as a "no" iVote. Nom is free to change an opinion, but not to vote a 2nd time. You should strike your 2nd ivote. It can take time to get the hang of these things. Cheers.E.M.Gregory (talk) 11:45, 11 November 2018 (UTC)


 * I have left the comment and struck out the delete. (You are right: Apart from this & its related article, I have not ever voted to delete an article before..) Thanks for your help on this. MargaretRDonald (talk) 18:22, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. SportingFlyer  talk  09:02, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't see that references in the article that would be required to meet WP:GNG and my own search doesn't support a claim of notability. Papaursa (talk) 01:36, 15 November 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.