Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Yogi Bear Song


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –Juliancolton Happy Holidays 01:06, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

The Yogi Bear Song

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Apparently a drinking song sung by fans of a particular rugby club. Disgusting lyrics, no claim of notability, no references just stupidity all around. There's been multiple occurrences of vandalism. -- Zanimum (talk) 19:37, 15 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete: The 2 references do not seem to pass WP:RS, and most of the article's content does not seem to be drawn from those ref's anyway. Pretty much an IINFO case. --IllaZilla (talk) 20:53, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. Although those two refs don't establish notability, there are plenty of other mentions of this song out there. See this one, for example, on the site of a popular San Fran rugby team. I don't know whether the song is notable enough for its own article - I suspect not - but perhaps rugby song could be expanded to include it. The current "rugby song" article reads more like a list, and could possibly use more info and perhaps a few sample lyrics from songs that don't have/need articles of their own.  Graymornings (talk) 21:37, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete That's not a reliable source either. None exist. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 22:57, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 'Delete as per unsourced, non-notable, if every dirty song rugby footballers liked was on wikipedia the interwebs would crash under the weight.Bali ultimate (talk) 23:09, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete This one is a real Boo-Boo. Ecoleetage (talk) 03:58, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 06:15, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of notability (and disgustingness?). People should be soberer when WPing. Drmies (talk) 06:45, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete hahaha no. JBsupreme (talk) 07:06, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Wow...you go back to the first edit on this, the song is relatively clean, and then you get to the current edit, it's all been purple monkey dishwashering from the first edit onward with several unsourced lyric changes. No reliable sources, and I don't know what else to say that others have already.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 12:33, 16 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.