Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Young and the Restless minor characters


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to List of The Young and the Restless characters.  Ryan Postlethwaite See the mess I've created or let's have banter 00:08, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

The Young and the Restless minor characters

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This page is no longer needed as all the characters that were once listed here have been moved to more properly organized pages.  Creativity  97 23:34, 31 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete All of the characters included, plus some, have been moved to decade and/or year pages. So this page is merely not required anymore. I fully support a speedy deletion. Music Freak 7676 TALK! 00:00, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of The Young and the Restless characters (or another appropriate target). The article history needs to be preserved to conform with Wikipedia's licensing requirements. - Eureka Lott 01:18, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect per above reasoning, stated by Eureka Lott. — Status  &#x7B;talk contribs 04:25, 1 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:24, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 1 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Redirect to List of The Young and the Restless characters per Eureka Lott. – sgeureka t•c 09:30, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I suppose that Eureka Lott makes a good point; the article history must be preserved. List of The Young and the Restless characters needs some work though I suppose redirecting Y&R M.C. to that page would be a very good idea. I withdraw my previous opinion to go with Redirect.  Creativity  97 14:13, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect- per all above. This is clearly the best solution. Reyk  YO!  21:46, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
 * So have we reached a consensus?? Or do we need more opinions??  Creativity 97  (Talk)  23:00, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * These discussions usually run for about 7 days, so it will most likely be closed late today or early tomorrow. Reyk  YO!  01:44, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.