Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Zombie Hunters


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   brains eaten. The Bushranger One ping only 18:17, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

The Zombie Hunters

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Webcomics-related deletion discussions.  Cliff  Smith 17:25, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Webcomics-related deletion discussions.  Cliff  Smith 17:25, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

More than a year ago I prodded this thing then lost track of it. Article has never had anything showing enough notability to deserve its own Wikipedia article. Only sources used are off topic (not even about this webcomic), fail WP:RS, are primary sources/not independent, or some combination of those problems. This topic fails WP:WEB, is essentially acting as free advertising, and therefore should be deleted. DreamGuy (talk) 04:05, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

DreamGuy is probably right as I wrote this with classmates for a class assignment. Good experience editing, but not a good product. I've removed the spammy and adverty info but left the potentially useful information. It's now only a stub with basic information about the comic and the author. It may be that the info could be condensed and moved to some other place, and delete the article. I've no interest in the existence of the article for its own sake. Igomes (talk) 21:18, 16 July 2012 (UTC) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 01:08, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Delete doesn't have the reliable sources to show notability. Rangoondispenser (talk) 23:48, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 15:32, 31 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete, barely even a claim to notability. Hairhorn (talk) 18:20, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.