Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Zongian Royal Family (2nd Era)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete  Nakon  02:38, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

The Zongian Royal Family (2nd Era)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The author removed the PROD tag after it had expired, so here we are. Article describes the family tree of a royal family inside the game Second Life; however, since notability is not inherited, this article fails the notability guidelines and doesn't back up its assertions with reliable sources establishing either its notability or significance. The article is also very much in-universe. I think this info should be maybe partially merged with Second Life. Any comments? GlobeGores (talk page | user page) 05:03, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete per non-notability. Madviolinist (talk) 05:37, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. I have no idea if this would actually merit inclusion, but we might want to consider a List of Second Life people or something to that effect. I don't believe we should merge these to the main article on the game, though. --Dhartung | Talk 05:52, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, virtually incomprehensible nonsense. Certainly there is absolutely no claim or evidence of notability. --Stormie (talk) 08:01, 20 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. I can find no evidence whatsoever of notability.  Anturiaethwr 14:59, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - no significant coverage in reliable sources; unverifiable. Does not meet any notability guidelines.-- Beloved Freak  15:53, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions.   --  Beloved  Freak  15:54, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.   --  Beloved  Freak  15:54, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable --Pustefix (talk) 18:22, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge what is useful into the main article on the game.--Berig (talk) 18:52, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
 * This is entirely the author's invention, there is nothing to merge. WillOakland (talk) 19:11, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
 * If so, it should be deleted.--Berig (talk) 06:16, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete nonsense about a gaming clan. WillOakland (talk) 19:11, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Per above; it seems like we need a Second Life expert to make this article more comprehensible? Gary King ( talk )  19:22, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
 * All you need to know is that Second Life is a blank-slate virtual reality that has no "mythology" other than what users choose to create within their own simulators. WillOakland (talk) 02:33, 25 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.