Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The belarussian bumble of 05


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was snowball delete. Sr13 08:16, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

The belarussian bumble of 05

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Prod contested with no edit summary. This article fails Complete bollocks. The article cites no sources, a google search reveals nothing to indicate that any of this is true, and on its face sounds like something made up in school one day. Darkspots 05:21, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as hoax. Ten Pound Hammer  • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 05:44, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Unfortunately in cases like this, hoaxes are not in and of themselves speediable. Darkspots 05:48, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as nonsense, then. DarkAudit 06:14, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Agreed. Speedy delete G1.  From Patent nonsense, G1 includes "Content that, while apparently meaningful after a fashion, is so completely and irredeemably confused that no reasonable person can be expected to make any sense of it whatsoever." Serpent&#39;s Choice 06:14, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Perhaps you're right. It doesn't seem like G1 to me, but it's definitely not worthy of inclusion in any case.  Darkspots 06:46, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, mildly amusing nonsense, but nonsense nonetheless. Lankiveil 07:01, 19 May 2007 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.