Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The book market of Bukhara


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If requested, I will restore the article to someone's private draft space so that they can work on improving it. MelanieN (talk) 03:26, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

The book market of Bukhara

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

An interesting text, but unfortunately it is original research published in wikipedia by a newcomer who does not understand our rules Staszek Lem (talk) 20:27, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2016 April 13.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 20:58, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Userfy - Again, no notability, no sources, no WP:GNG met, userfy and resubmit via the wizard if they can adapt. - SanAnMan (talk) 21:06, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Userfy I'm not sure if this will ever meet WP:GNG, but we can try. The editor who created this has many of his articles flagged for speedy or proposed deletion, mostly due to original research. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 22:47, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not notable article which looks like an essay. --Ochilov (talk) 05:23, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete and Userfy as I would encourage this user to save us some time, familiarize himself with Wikipedia and take his time, instead of submitting these articles which still need improvements. SwisterTwister   talk  05:49, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Userfy unless seriously rescued: Indications are that the subject might be notable from a glance at GBooks, and it seems likely that there would be additional Arabic and maybe other foreign language sources (Farsi, Russian, Turkish, ...). ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 14:06, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:09, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:09, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Uzbekistan-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:09, 14 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Weak delete - if Userfy works or another user improves, could become an article that passes all standards. DaltonCastle (talk) 22:26, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't see evidence the subject is notable. This subject should be developed within the Emirate of Bukhara article and the spun off. Sadly, it looks like the author doesn't converse in English and likely won't make the needed changes. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 01:06, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep or userify -- This is a bad article on a notable subject. I am not convinced that this is so bad that it needs TNT.  We are encouraged DONTBITE to new users.  Peterkingiron (talk) 17:57, 17 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.