Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The breathing dead


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  00:58, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

The breathing dead

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod of an unremarkable book. I can find no independent sources to establish notability. THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 21:39, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete unless reliable sources are forthcoming; I concur with the nominator. the skomorokh  21:42, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete. Lots of name dropping but zero evidence of notability. (I was born the year of Elvis Presley's death too, and there's no way I'd try to use that as a claim to importance.) Would go for speedy except A7 doesn't apply to books. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 21:53, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, seems to be self-published (by Lulu), which isn't an absolute no-no, but very few self published books are notable, and this does not appear to be one of the exceptions. Lankiveil (speak to me) 04:20, 29 November 2008 (UTC).
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:33, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, article fails WP:BK, no reliable sources to establish notability. Note: the author of the article removed the AfD notice, it has been restored.--Captain-tucker (talk) 10:14, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment, I've moved the article to The Breathing Dead to fix the caps problem.--Rockfang (talk) 10:45, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable; not a crystal ball. Brammarb (talk) 13:41, 1 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.