Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The cliff dwellers handbook


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete.  Sango  123   03:17, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

The cliff dwellers handbook
Essay. The page appears to have been created by the author of a nn book with a similar title. The page is not wikified and has a number of spelling and grammatical errors. FreeKresge 01:53, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Even if it is not original research (which is certainly the impression one is given), it is not at all encyclopedic, and even reads as rather ridiculous. ---Charles 02:57, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as nn junk AdamBiswanger1 03:00, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom --Pak21 09:24, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom StuartF 11:22, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable junk. I certainly hope the author of the book didn't really write the article (although his blog suggests otherwise).  The book is trash, and the article is worse. Ted 12:47, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as junk. --Arnzy (whats up?)  13:52, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -999 (Talk) 15:55, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Reads like the back of a bad book. --12.175.19.178 03:46, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Patent bad nonsense -- Alphachimp  talk  04:13, 16 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.