Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The crystalline planet Dxun


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-01 08:26Z 

The crystalline planet Dxun

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

As far as I can tell, this doesn't exist. The Chmmr article contridicts it (although that's unsourced as well, of course) and the GameFAQs walkthroughs I looked at didn't mention it either. Don't be fooled by the Google hits for Dxun, these all appear to be refering to the unrelated Star Wars moon Dxun. Even if it does exist, I don't think it would be notable. BryanG(talk) 04:57, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Someone must have been very confused when he created this article. The GameFAQs evidence indicates that the planet does not exist at all: see this list of star systems in the game. --N Shar 05:15, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * comment: Dxun isn't in any Star Control game I can remember, it is, however in the star wars universe, and takes a rather central part in Sith backstory there... I would venture they really mean "Dxun the demon moon" which may or may not warrant a seperate article from the star wars articles. Wintermut3 09:04, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * As I mentioned in the nom, there is a separate article for the Star Wars moon at Dxun. In fact, the way I found this one is that it was erroneously tagged . BryanG(talk) 19:14, 25 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. Koweja 18:16, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete either a hoax or more appropriate for a gaming wiki. In either case not appropriate for Wikipedia. Koweja 18:16, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Whether or not it exists, it doesn't belong here. --- RockMFR 21:22, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: Three sentences, wrong info and what's written also is not encyclopedic.DreamingLady 13:31, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. The information is unverified, and the article is poorly titled.  --Alan Au 23:02, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Wikipedia is not a game guide; the information is wrong; the topic is not notable. &mdash;ptk✰fgs 05:45, 27 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.