Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The ear and how it works


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 19:00, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

The ear and how it works
New article which duplicates Ear. I put a prod tag on it, and explained to the author why. S/he removed the tag, so I'm bringing it here. Delete as duplicate Squiddy | (squirt ink?)  15:38, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. It's not even worth a redirect. -- Kicking222 16:06, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Good information, good layout, but duplicated at ear.  Navou   talk  16:11, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Gw e rnol 16:14, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Ydam 17:25, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and merge duplicate (no redirect needed), but make sure any good information is transferred to Ear first. LjL 19:43, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, duplicate material. --Ter e nce Ong 04:51, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete – as duplicate. If there is any difference between the two articles, then merge as necessary – Gurch 13:40, 20 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.