Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The effect of President Trump's policies on bodies of water


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Bishonen &#124; talk 00:08, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

The effect of President Trump's policies on bodies of water

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article, apparently started as a class assignment and abandoned, seems to be an incomplete outline with sources. It is possible a reasonable article could be written on the topic with a modified title, but this is not it. If anyone wants to claim the draft to continue working on it, I have no objections to its being moved to user or draft space for development (and care should be take to avoid WP:OR). Lady of  Shalott  22:45, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  Lady  of  Shalott  22:59, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  Lady  of  Shalott  23:00, 16 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. Unsourced and undeveloped. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:26, 16 March 2017 (UTC).
 * Comment This is a student draft that should have been created in a sandbox. I'd prefer to userfy it, that's OK. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 23:59, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:34, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:34, 17 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Userfy as per Ed. This is clearly a draft that ended up in the wrong namespace.-- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 07:35, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete completely. The student is now editing Stream Protection Rule on a similar topic, with almost the same lead sentence, and is unlikely to do anything with this. StarryGrandma (talk) 00:31, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. As mentioned by others, this seems to have been created in the wrong space. It would be OK to userfy if needs it, but it seems unnecessary at this point. Jack N. Stock (talk) 02:48, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete possibly even candidate for speedy deletion. Porphyro (talk) 12:59, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-encyclopedic, although, certainly, if he doesn't get impeached soon, an article on the Trump administration policies impact on the environment will be important to have.E.M.Gregory (talk) 13:54, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - as per above. CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   18:33, 23 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.