Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The emoticons of avatars


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete (WP:SNOW). King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 09:36, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

The emoticons of avatars

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unencyclopedic personal essay about websites and relationships. I did a Google search to see if this article was a copyright violation but the Google search came up negative. Cunard (talk) 01:22, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Appears to be original research. ttonyb1 (talk) 01:28, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete essay, probably for school. JJL (talk) 01:30, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - yes, it looks like a school essay. The title is not especially encyclopedic, so it wouldn't be useful to redirect. FreplySpang 01:47, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Original research is expressly prohibited here.  JBsupreme (talk) 02:38, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, gently, as original research. I don't see any criteria for speedy deletion that this appears to meet, though.  But comparing YouTube to the Roman forum makes you wonder what kind of amateur videos the Romans would like.  And the author has obviously done a fair amount of research in writing this paper, and ought to be encouraged and steered to more encyclopedic subjects. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:50, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Even if it is original research, it is not article worthy without at least one more notable source to back it up. Appears to be one person's unique philosophy, which is not encyclopedia. 67.83.85.236 (talk) 22:31, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete But first make sure the author is aware and understands why, a great deal of work has obviously gone into all this writing. Pstanton 22:47, 12 January 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pstanton (talk • contribs)
 * Delete not an article. JuJube (talk) 01:31, 13 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.