Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The faerie door


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:45, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

The faerie door

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod; removed by anon IP without explanation. Non-notable book. Only 3 ghits; cites no sources, only makes claims of notability. Author does not have an article, either. Fails WP:RS and WP:V. &mdash;  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 16:29, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - It is not notable at all, as it has 208 Google hits (at least when I searched it), and not many of the searches seem connected to this article. It is also written very unencyclopedically. — Cuyler  91093  -  Соитяівцтіоиѕ  17:09, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:CRYSTAL.  This book hasn't even been published yet (and isn't scheduled to be until October).   While some upcoming books are notable, this book doesn't quite fall into the Harry Potter sphere.  -- ShinmaWa(talk) 17:54, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - I tried with Google and found 544,000 entries. I found so many things, The Faerie Door Network, The Faerie Door Shop, The Faerie Door House, The Faerie Door Forest... but Alas! Where is The Faerie Door Novel? ... failed at WP:N and WP:V. -- Niaz  (Talk •  Contribs)  18:16, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per nom--NAHID 19:58, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as a crystal-ball. The fact its release date is given as October 2008 may be part of the reason for its lack of sources. Recreate if and when the book is released and becomes notable enough. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 22:10, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP: CRYSTAL. -  Milk's   Favorite   Cookie  22:24, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Unlike most spammy adverts for books, this one at least is coming out from a major publisher -- but reviews indicating notablity won't be coming out until at least a couple months before publication. No prejudice against recreating if and when notability can be demonstrated. —Quasirandom (talk) 00:04, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per crystal. It's pretty ad-like. Doczilla (talk) 01:09, 8 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.