Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The first Shabbat spent by civilians in Hebron after the Six Day War


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. — FireFox ( UTC ) 10:53, 28 May '06

The first Shabbat spent by civilians in Hebron after the Six Day War
A bit too detailed for Wikipedia. -- RHaworth 07:51, 23 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Since when is that a ground for deletion? Perhaps the article should be nominated on Wikipedia:Articles for trimming . --Lambiam Talk 08:55, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. It is, however, in desperate need of a major rewrite, since it reads like someone's college term paper right now.  --fuzzy510 09:00, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I wonder what the good rabbi doctor will think of his article being described as a college term paper. -- RHaworth 13:07, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

As the author of this article, I should like to point out that even people one would have expected to know about this Shabbat in Hebron had never heard about it. The article was therefore written not as a scholarly article but as a factual reconstruction of a significant historical event, which otherwise would have been forgotten.
 * This contribution was added on 19:01, May 23, 2006 (UTC) by Simonschaimcontributions, who apparently claims to be the same person as author Rabbi Dr. Chaim Simons, simonschaim@hotmail.co.il, of the piece at http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Senate/7854/parkhotel.html. I have no reason to doubt this claim. This would make this definitely not copyvio. --Lambiam Talk 09:10, 24 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. An nice piece of journalism, but its never going to be an encyclopedia article.  Oh, and OR. -- GWO
 * Delete this web cut-and-paste from here. Not possible to make this an encyclopediac article - Peripitus 11:16, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, possible original research, essay? --Ter e nce Ong 12:00, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, it's original research.    Proto    ||    type    12:49, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, copyvio as per Peripitus's research. Vizjim 15:15, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per above. -- stubblyh ea d | T/c 16:21, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Pavel Vozenilek 20:09, 26 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.