Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The history of stones circles in Ireland

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. – ugen64 19:58, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)

The history of stones circles in Ireland
Useless article, just scrapes past speedy, not encyclopedic, not worth a redirect. Smoddy (Rabbit and pork) 14:24, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Could be a speedy. Clearly patent nonsense. Hedley 15:42, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Patent nonsense? Explain how this qualifies as nonsense? Revolución 16:13, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep also needs a better name. Revolución 16:15, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
 * There doesn't appear to be a Stone circles in Ireland article, so any content this gathers could be moved there. Christopher Parham (talk) 18:53, 2005 May 23 (UTC)


 * Delete unless improved by the time vote closes (verifiable examples of stone circles being added, obviously, would be essential). Christopher Parham (talk) 17:33, 2005 May 23 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete for nonsense seems fine to me. In Ireland many stone circles are?  Huh?  Their history is long and mystic?  How is there sense in that?  Stone circles meaning exactly what?  Are these barrows?  We already have articles on the red ochre graves, on the mound builders, etc.  This is just nebulous stuff.  No focus, no content. Geogre 17:56, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
 * You may want to see this link: Revolución 18:14, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Ok. I still don't see the refutation.  Irish megaliths, stone circles (not "stones circles" per this article), but no "history" of them, and no "deep and mystic."  No redirect, because there's no content here and no chance of a search by this name.  No content. Geogre 20:36, 23 May 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. While (I hope) no one disputes the existence of stone cicles in Ireland, this article is not the one to describe them. Had this appeared with a speedy delete tag, I'd have obliged. Best delete and restart with a more appropriate title.Denni &#9775; 21:09, 2005 May 23 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as being content-free. --Carnildo 22:06, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep if made into a real article by closing time, otherwise delete. RickK 22:34, May 23, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep or Delete as per RickK.    &mdash; P Ingerson  (talk)  00:12, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep if expanded and moved to Stone circles in Ireland. Megan1967 05:31, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
 * I would have speedy deleted it as hopelessly confused nonsense. -- Cyrius|&#9998; 06:22, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
 * It would be nice to have the arcticle about stone circles in Ireland but this is hardly promising beginning. Delete - Skysmith 08:05, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - this is such a waste of time - it should have been speedied - if someone wants to write a real article on the subject they could do that anytime later --Doc (t) 09:43, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - even in a single line they managed spelling errors. "The history" would imply a great length, otherwise not encyclopaedic. Internodeuser 14:00, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Xcali 05:15, 27 May 2005 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.