Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The land of sapphire


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Secret account 01:17, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

The land of sapphire

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

WP:CRYSTAL: book doesn't exist yet. WP:N: no evidence of notability. —Largo Plazo (talk) 13:30, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Has absolutely no evidence of notability. And even sillier, the author is not even mentioned. Probably a hoax (article created by an SPA named iGoofy). Angryapathy (talk) 15:49, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. This is most likely eligible for a speedy deletion. There is no assertion of notability in the article. The author is stated as "a young girl in California. •••Life of Riley (T–C) 16:58, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * FYI, WP:CSD A7, the provision regarding assertions of importance or significance (not WP:Notability, which isn't addressed by any of the speedy deletion provisions), doesn't apply to books or stories. —Largo Plazo (talk) 17:02, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Whoops! My mistake. Thanks for the correction. •••Life of Riley (T–C) 17:13, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, no reliable sources to show notability. ~YellowFives 17:10, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete, according to the talk page of the article's original author "The Land of Sapphire" was speedy deleted under G11. This was presumably the same article as we are now discussing but with different capitalisation.Malcolma (talk) 18:24, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I didn't see that version, so I can only comment on this one. I don't see anything openly promotional about it. All it does is describe the story. —Largo Plazo (talk) 19:12, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * delete - it looks like description of a school student's homework, so is either as notable as what I had for dinner or a curious hoax. JohnBlackburne (talk) 22:36, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Unless a book is a highly expected one by an established author, it's not a good idea to write an article. Since this book doesn't yet exist and is written by an author who isn't even named, it meets all the criteria to be deleted. I would personally TenPoundHammer's Law for music albums to books here. A book article needs basic info before it can be created, the author's name is one of them. - Mgm|(talk) 10:45, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, article can't name author, story isn't even finished, so there's no way to confirm anything. No basis for article.Bjones (talk) 21:18, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable at best. Edward321 (talk) 03:06, 5 December 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.