Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The method of Goli (FIFA 0607.27a)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was DELETE. nonsense. --Madchester 20:00, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

The method of Goli (FIFA 0607.27a)
Completely unclear article, almost to the point of putting it up as patent nonsense, but not quite. It might have something to do with sports. Fails the Google test. eaolson 02:56, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, as good as nonsense.--Peta 03:41, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. Fabricationary 05:07, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. I can't even figure out what this article is supposed to be about (a proposed football/soccer rule?). Borderline nonsense. --Core des at talk. ^_^ 06:04, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete the proposal outlined is nonsense, the article is utterly non-notable. MLA 09:32, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete a completely nonsensical article. Even if it made sense it's clearly WP:OR - Peripitus (Talk) 12:04, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * It does make sense. Translating into English:  It's a proposal to replace the penalty shootout method of determining tied games in football matches with a rule that involves counting how many times each goalie has touched the ball.  The article states that it is documenting an idea that was invented on 2006-07-27, i.e. yesterday.  The article is clearly original research. Delete. Uncle G 13:04, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Uncle G. --Metropolitan90 14:09, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I prefer the method of Gollum in any case.  Smerdis of Tlön 14:25, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete as original research. NawlinWiki 16:51, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. I also suspect it may be a copyvio (albeit one that's translated. Badly). -- Daduzi  talk  22:59, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete' per everyone. Unfortunately this does have some sort of syntax, which saves it from being complete gibberish and a speedy. Jacqui ★ 02:34, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - if there is any significant attempt at amending the rules of football, it will, no doubt, be accounted for under the appropriate artcles e.g Laws of the Game -- Alias Flood 04:25, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as nonsensical. Vickser 22:21, 29 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.