Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The most beautiful girl in the world


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Redirect to The Most Beautiful Girl in the World -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:43, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

The most beautiful girl in the world

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

non encyclopedic essay, original research, vanity article, author removed ProD Wuhwuzdat (talk) 05:45, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. Unverifiable essay, a perfect example of original research. OlEnglish (talk) 05:51, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nominator. Edward321 (talk) 06:05, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Because I like it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adamc714 (talk • contribs) 06:07, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * See WP:ILIKEIT -- Longhair\talk 06:10, 12 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - per nom. -- Longhair\talk 06:10, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect - per User:ChrisTheDude -- Longhair\talk 20:24, 12 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete : WP:VANITY article whose purpose is to claim that the page creator's sweetheart, "Indrė", is the most beautiful girl in the world. A noble sentiment, but wikipedia is not a valentine's day greeting service.  Baileypalblue (talk) 06:14, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect per User:ChrisTheDude, as it's apparently a useful search term. Baileypalblue (talk) 08:54, 12 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete WP:OR, unencyclopedic. &mdash; LinguistAtLarge • Talk  06:49, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to The Most Beautiful Girl in the World. Besides, this girl can't be the most beautiful girl in the world, because my wife is :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:26, 12 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - WP:OR. (Plus my girlfriend's better looking than she is. :)) DitzyNizzy (aka Jess) | (talk to me) | (What I've done)  10:22, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete It is an unencyclopedic essay filled with original research. - Mgm|(talk) 11:39, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect per ChrisTheDude above. This is essentially a greeting card, which would more appropriately be given to the recipient in handwriting and with a nice box of chocolates. Townlake (talk) 15:14, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete and Redirect to DitzyNizzy's girlfriend to the other dab as per Chris. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ddawkins73 (talk • contribs) 15:39, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect per prior comments. -- smurdah  [citation needed]  16:00, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect per the above. -- Explodicle (T/C) 18:47, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Reads like an essay, the "Reference" is non-researchable and non-notable, plus this seems to be an opinion based article Tarheel95 Talk —Preceding undated comment was added at 22:48, 12 February 2009 (UTC).
 * Delete No encyclopedic value. Pastor Theo (talk) 01:24, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. I've made the obvious redirect per WP:IAR. I don't know how to close an AfD discussion so someone please do that. Phil Bridger (talk) 22:06, 13 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.