Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The movie addict


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete HappyCamper 02:00, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

The movie addict
Fails WP:WEB. Alexa rank at all, no media attention asserted, and their forum has all of four registered users. Its creator was deleted in this afd debate. &mdash;Cryptic (talk) 02:10, 26 October 2005 (UTC) NOTE: Website features more than "three" reviews. In fact I have written over 1600, it's just that the site is in the process of construction right now. Another index of reviews is at rottentomatoes.com/author-6769.
 * Delete Until i've, ya know, heard of it. Vanity.--CastAStone 02:29, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:WEB. THREE movie reviews does not an addict make! &mdash; mendel &#9742; 03:38, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails all possible inclusion guidelines for websites. - Mgm|(talk) 11:40, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom - Just zis Guy, you know? 14:55, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Per reasons above.--Newyorktimescrossword 23:23, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

Media assertation: The Movie Addict is the new domain of its previous incarnation, wiredonmovies.com, which had over 1,000,000 visitors in a year, including Meg Ryan and Roger Ebert.

Alexa rank: Don't know why it doesn't have one. But wiredonmovies.com does, and it's the same site, just under a different domain.

And finally, the Monroe Mann debate was a joke - it doesn't mean everything I submit is automatically erroneous. You fail the mention all the other articles I have worked on that AREN'T in any way, shape or form "false." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.173.172.116 (talk • contribs) 02:33, 27 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. Vanity. -- Hurricane Eric - my dropsonde 01:53, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.