Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The new holocaust


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy deleted as being a contribution by a banned user (CSD G5). --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:59, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

The new holocaust

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable term. One reference simply refers to a banner with the text, and is not a good source for the statement. The third source has nothing to do with the topic at hand. I cannot judge the second reference without a link. Indeed, as far as I can tell from a Google search, this term is used to describe just about any conflict one can think of - not just the one presented here. And, indeed, this article seems very much like a violation of WP:NPOV and WP:OR. I originally tagged for WP:CSD as an attack page, but with the removal of the Mengele image, perhaps WP:AfD is the way to go. - Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 09:55, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Feels like a POV fork to me. The sources don't back up the article's claims, they refer to New Holocaust something else (like book), which isn't the same as New Holocaust, so doesn't have WP:RS. Also hits WP:Neologism. -- Ged UK  11:11, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete The term does feel like a neologism and lacks WP:RS at present. --Artene50 (talk) 11:23, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable unsourced neologism, sources do not support article. Edward321 (talk) 14:31, 26 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.