Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The new wrinkle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:56, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

The new wrinkle
This article has only been edited (beyond deleting an image and tagging as unencyclopedic) by one of the hosts. It does not appear to be notable, merely vanity. Quentin mcalmott 03:41, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete No assertion of importance.  -- JamesTeterenko 04:03, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete See above. --Planetary 06:24, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per above Konman72 09:46, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Err, what's wrong with letting the AfD run its course? fuddlemark (befuddle me!) 15:41, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't know guys. I'm sure that we can take our time deleting. This is a five day process. But I do want it deleted.--Edtalk c E  16:38, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Regular speed delete, doesn't meet any speedy deletion criteria, but seems rather non-notable. Recury 16:40, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom. Google search only yields a couple of hits that are related to this show.  will381796 16:54, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per above. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DDima (talk • contribs) 20:32 (UTC) 16 August 2006
 * Delete fails to satisfy, in any way, WP:WEB. I feel no urge to speedy, though.-- danntm T C 23:47, 16 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.