Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The operacycle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep--Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:01, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

The operacycle

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

non notable musical work Gaijin42 (talk) 18:34, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:50, 24 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 05:45, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Keep - I have expanded the article with references. These three sources provide enough material to satisfy WP:GNG and WP:BAND.  Gong   show  19:39, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northern   Antarctica   ₵  02:19, 10 April 2014 (UTC)




 * Keep - I couldn't find much (and so I understand the nomination) but the material added by Gongshow would seem to be enough to substantiate notability. Could use more work but its a good start. Stalwart 111  07:26, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:HEY. Bearian (talk) 23:22, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.