Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The origin of the chinese character


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:27, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

The origin of the chinese character

 * – ( View AfD View log )

One sentenced. Un-sourced. Irrelevant. KING OF WIKIPEDIA - GRIM LITTLEZ (talk) 23:34, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
 * WITHDRAWN Procedural Keep for now. Too soon to vote on this, as the article was nominated three minutes after its creation. It could still be a work in progress. Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:00, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Article has yet to be expanded, even though ample time was given. Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:12, 7 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete, or if it's felt necessary for some reason, redirect to Chinese character. There's no way that this single-sentence, unsourced bit of assertion can be expanded without duplicating material already present elsewhere or introducing material that is better placed elsewhere (such as Neolithic signs in China). The article hasn't been edited (except for being AfD'd) since its creation more than two hours ago, and the way to encourage new editors is not to "procedurally" reinforce their misguided attempts at article creation; it's to guide them in contributing constructively to the encyclopedia. Deor (talk) 01:53, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete almost no content. And the chinese character article already says more than this, so duplication of topic. 65.94.47.217 (talk) 05:31, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Looks like it is redundant to other articles. Qrsdogg (talk) 15:21, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Move to chinese character, chinese language, or chinese writing because we should not lose this information, but because the title is ill formed and has little chance of expansion.Curb Chain (talk) 11:50, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.