Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The power of color


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete-- JForget 01:29, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

The power of color

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod. Article is unencyclopedic, unreferenced and original research &mdash;Salmar (talk) 23:44, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

The article is a page representing the well know idea of the power of color which books have been written on. Seeing no page on wikipeidea with it i felt obliged to write it i will continue to edit and it will continue to grow. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonut82 (talk • contribs) 23:47, 31 October 2007 (UTC) — Jonut82 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete. The nom has it right - no referencing, it's orig research, and on top of that, it doesn't give much context.  I hate to sound disparaging, but it's also not really well written - it sort of rings of a lot of new age philosophy (which there can be more theories than adherents, in my observation), and seemingly borrows from other articles (which brings us back to OR again).  -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 23:57, 31 October 2007 (UTC)


 * delete not a title anyone will put in the search of wikip, plus all the content is already at colour therapy-the correct name for this. (or could be added to there).Merkinsmum 00:06, 1 November 2007 (UTC)


 * do not delete colour tharapy has some of the ideas but not all and if this guy is going to keep working on it and add new ideas then what is the problem. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shamty (talk • contribs) — Shamty (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Do Not DeleteThe author is presenting ideas on a subject that differs from color therapy in a way that deserves a completely separate article and i am sure it will not be this small in a week. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Soccerr (talk • contribs) 00:21, 1 November 2007 (UTC)  — Soccerr (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Do Delete A surprisingly colorless article that hints at covering a wide range of things... auras, effect of color on personality, your personal color, etc.... and has a web source entitled "Red may increase blood pressure" Mandsford 01:27, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete nonsense, and created by, who is a duplicate account of who has a long list of nonsense articles that were also deleted. JuJube 01:46, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * comment note the WP:SPAs. Some of this content could go in aura, and the 'scientific' claims are already in 'colour therapy'.  Ths is mainly one person's Original Research/synthesis.Merkinsmum 02:00, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. A puff-piece of New Age thought without sources or facts. humblefool&reg; 04:46, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Do not delete. why are you guys so enraged about this article its not like its stopping you from putting up articles and even thou there is very little information at this time dosent mean we should delete the information it has. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.75.241.206 (talk) 05:17, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * If you want to think we're enraged, go ahead and think this. Trust me, though, we're not. -- Dennis The Tiger  (Rawr and stuff) 17:39, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete As the nomination has it spot on. Also, is it just me that thinks the various 'Do Not Delete' comments are coming from the same single source?Alberon 09:53, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom -- Dougie WII 13:48, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as original research -- Whpq 15:47, 1 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.