Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The proces of Adolf Eichmann


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 23:30, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

The proces of Adolf Eichmann

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Duplicates content already in Adolf Eichmann. (If there are any new details, they can be added.) No need for a separate article. Was tagged for speedy deletion as A10, but author removed tag with a note that content had been expanded.

The title is misspelled, but that doesn't matter. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:42, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:42, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:42, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:42, 29 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nom. This duplicates better coverage elsewhere, and a merge would only reduce the quality of the target. The misspelling just makes it an even less useful redirect. Agricolae (talk) 19:15, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Duplicate coverage. Oaktree b (talk) 23:50, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom; I assume "proces" is supposed to mean trial? Not an improvement on the content in Adolf Eichmann. power~enwiki ( π,  ν ) 04:18, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. The topic with some title corrections is extremely notable and totally legitimate. The reason for deletion is that the coverage in the spinoff is shorter than in the main article. It should be the other way around. As mentioned above, it is also of lesser quality. A merger could harm the main. A redirect would be useless because the title wording isn't right. gidonb (talk) 05:51, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete -- If there were anything additional to the article on Adolf Eichmann, I would have voted to merge back to that article. What happened was perhaps controversial, since it was the result of kidnap, not extradition, but that does not mean we need two articles.  Peterkingiron (talk) 14:58, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete because the Eichmann article covers the trial in greater detail. The trial could be spun out, but if that were done it would have to be much more detailed than the summary in Eichmann. Vici Vidi (talk) 08:10, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:19, 5 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.