Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The res3ia Enigma


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was deleted by Duncharris.  Sango  123   23:07, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

The res3ia Enigma
lack of sources. Only 1 hit on search engines, linking to the same page on geocities. George100 21:06, 3 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep and expand - it's presence is justified, it just needs links and needs expanding. Benjaminstewart05 20:48, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The existence of one Geocities article does not justify this topic's presence on Wikipedia. User:Zoe|(talk) 21:17, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, article fails to indicate any notability. User:Zoe|(talk) 20:49, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as a bunch of non-notable, unverifiable nonsense. -- Kicking222 22:25, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

User: science_watch Could you enlighten me as to what exactly is wrong with my entry. Having used Wikipedia for some time, I thought I would make a contribution of my own, only to discover that you had recommended it for deletion within moments.
 * To Zoe: Your proposed deletion of my first entry to Wikipedia :The res3ia Enigma

science_watch

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Zoe"

User:science_watch
 * Delete possibly speedy, OR, nonsense. etc. &mdash; Dunc|&#9786; 21:13, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
 * '''To Duncharris : Could you enlighten me as to why you consider this nonsense?
 * Speedy delete as repost of deleted material. Kimchi.sg 23:03, 3 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.