Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The role of clowns in modern society


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 10:24, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

The role of clowns in modern society

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Joke. De-prodded w/ comment (in edit summary at author's talk page) "i believe that this article should be kept in wikipedias database because it is a serious account of the trouble clowns face on a daily basis and i wish to raise awareness in the debate about this." Pan Dan 21:05, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete, speedy if we can find a reason. (no context?)  It's an essay - and a badly written one at that. --Dennisthe2 21:24, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete totally unsourced and original research. Dr bab 22:13, 8 April 2007 (UTC).
 * Delete looks like a joke to me.--Joebengo 23:31, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - definitely looks like a joke to me. --Haemo 23:54, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and WP:DAFT. Grutness...wha?  00:22, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete for being WP:Complete Bollocks. Eddie.willers 01:12, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete Original Research and POV Rackabello 05:51, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Hoax - there is no such place as Eccleshill University. I suspect this is made up in school one day, probably in Sheffield. Sam Blacketer 16:25, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Move to The role of clowns in modern theology and rewrite the article accordingly. The result should be quite amusing. Jtrainor 06:46, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as utter nonsense. Pavel Vozenilek 00:15, 13 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.