Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The schools of thought on strategy formulation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  09:11, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

The schools of thought on strategy formulation

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not independently notable (WP:GNG). If appropriate, content can be merged to Henry Mintzberg / strategic management. Brianga (talk) 17:05, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:45, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:45, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lepricavark (talk) 01:34, 17 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - This may be worth a muchmuch shorter summary on the author's main article. But currently is just a vaguely promotional book report. The book itself may be notable ...maybe... It's got a lot of citations on scholar, but apparently this guy is not even the sole author of it, and it's not clear why this fairly arbitrary classification system needs singled out. I mean, maybe I'm missing something, but all I see is promotionalism through undue (if otherwise fairly neutral) attention. Timothy Joseph Wood  13:22, 17 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.