Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The sean equation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Speedy delete (as patent nonsense). --Nlu (talk) 16:42, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

The sean equation
I have difficultly believing this, as both a physicist and a mathematician. I see no practical use at all. Googling "the sean equation" gives no results, googling "sean equation" gives 8 which don't seem to be relevant. Deskana 22:40, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Please also delete Sean Moffit along with this. - Mgm|(talk) 12:05, 9 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. --Syrthiss 22:46, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as hoax. Ifnord 23:14, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per above Barneyboo (Talk) 23:15, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom and as probable hoax. ManoaChild 23:40, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Rhobite 01:51, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete- appears to be a hoax. Reyk 08:48, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - hoax Bergsten 16:46, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete &mdash; Simplfy angles by dividing by two? Hoax. &mdash; RJH 16:53, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete rubbish. Stifle 20:28, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete joke. B.Wind 00:19, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, hoax. Mushroom 01:36, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete: yet another A Sean hoax. -- JimR 06:31, 11 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.