Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The second most useless UNIX command


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!)  10:50, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

The second most useless UNIX command

 * delete. I removed the speedy tag for patent nonsense, because unfortunately I don't think it qualifies. Nevertheless it's irredeemably POV and OR. --Trovatore 18:59, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete it anyway. -- SoothingR 19:12, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
 * delete. He doesn't even list off what he thinks the most useless command is. --SmileyDude 19:25, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
 * emacs Hipocrite - &laquo; Talk &raquo; 21:07, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
 * vi Hipocrite - &laquo; Talk &raquo; 21:07, 24 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete, POV rant with inherently POV title. --Idont Havaname 21:40, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete no way this can be anything but POV chowells 21:41, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete for the reasons given above, and also because it's blatantly wrong. (emacs and vi are obviously tied for first place, so su couldn't be higher than third. JED FTW!) &mdash; Haeleth Talk 23:34, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
 * As per, delete. Uncle G 11:44, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete &mdash; Actually a fairly useful command for most UNIX SysAdmins. Author has some sort of quasi-spiritual UNIX bias. &mdash; RJH 18:39, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * speedy delete the title itself has POV written all over it. --Bachrach44 18:46, 28 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.