Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The ship beautiful


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to RMS Aquitania. ✗ plicit  12:40, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

The ship beautiful

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Nickname for RMS Aquitania. Content fork redirected there by 3 different editors (including me), but article creator keeps restoring their page. Time to put an end to this and make a clear statement that this should remain a redirect. Fram (talk) 10:44, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and United Kingdom. Fram (talk) 10:44, 14 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Redirect to RMS Aquitania per nom. FatalFit &#124; &#9993; &#124; ✓ 11:00, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
 * redirect No information that isn't already in the main article exists here. Carpimaps talk to me! 11:46, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect (I'm one of three editor who redirect this before) and have a serious chat with the author, even if he has previously shown that he doesn't listen to any explanation as to why his contributions have been deleted/edited (no notes in the text, non-academic and neutral language and non-standard structured sections in general, as well as several demonstrations of not having read the material already present before adding the information) and just keep restoring them claiming to have "a lot of knowledge". Sira Aspera (talk) 12:35, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I also believe this could classify for quick erase according to Db-a10 Sira Aspera (talk) 21:35, 14 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Redirect as suggested, perhaps salt this name/article title if it keeps being created. The ship was known by this name and what's here is trivial. I suppose it could have its own article if we had scholarly discussions around the use of the title, but we don't. Oaktree b (talk) 13:30, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect and protect the redirect page to keep it from being restored again. A needless WP:FORK that does not contain any genuine information that is not already covered on the main article on the ship. Rorshacma (talk) 14:59, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect per above. -Ljleppan (talk) 17:26, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect per nom. Mccapra (talk) 20:58, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect as a WP:CFORK. gidonb (talk) 02:18, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect per nominator. Most of the content is duplicated from RMS Aquitania. There are only a couple of sentences about the nickname itself. J I P  &#124; Talk 10:33, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect as suggested above. I do not think that a separate article is needed and a redirect makes sense for navigational purposes. Dunarc (talk) 21:03, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment. It's snowing! gidonb (talk) 02:05, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep Please do not delete the article. I have mentioned some extra information, which is not included in the article for the RMS Aquitania. Thanks for the understanding! Ale.ch.geor (talk) 23:17, 14 June 2023 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.44.141.202 (talk)
 * Redirect back to main article as an unnecessary content fork/duplication and protect against recreation. -- Kinu t/c 04:59, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect, but not delete -- this seems like a very clearly good redirect title. jp×g 17:28, 18 June 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.