Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The state51 Conspiracy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  19:59, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

The state51 Conspiracy

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NCORP. Among the current sources are a reddit post, a google support page, the website for the marketing firm, a blogpost by a violinist, a source that doesn't mention the name except to thank them for a location, an article from a low-quality source describing an album release, and the company's website. I can't find anything searching Google that indicates that the marketing firm meets WP:ORGCRIT, so I propose it be deleted. — Mhawk10 (talk) 04:44, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. — Mhawk10 (talk) 04:44, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — Mhawk10 (talk) 04:44, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. — Mhawk10 (talk) 04:44, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. — Mhawk10 (talk) 04:44, 28 March 2022 (UTC)


 * It also has sources from news and government websites, which indicate high-quality data and notability of company and meets WP:NCORP. I suggest this article should not be deleted. but, paragraphs that refer to low credibility sources should be removed immediately. Sahilaim (talk) 05:10, 28 March 2022 (UTC)


 * delete SPEEDY. Per nom. No coverage that demonstrates notability. Also hints at being written as a hit piece, and the content is so low quality it would have to be WP:NUKEIT anyhow. Sahilaim, that link to the government website just shows the incorporation exists and nothing else. One source is a passing mention, and one is a press release. Only one source is actually about the subject and it's an industry magazine which isn't significant coverage. Ironmatic1 (talk) 05:16, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
 * this company is mentioned in many other articles on wiki. do this support the current article? Sahilaim (talk) 06:26, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
 * No. Please take a look at WP:General notability guideline, passing mentions in other Wikipedia articles does not show notability. By the way, it's polite to disclose that you are the creator of the article. I suggest that next time you create an article that you submit it through WP:Articles for Creation. Also, I see that the article is almost completely blanked now. Ironmatic1 (talk) 06:40, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I will keep this in my mind while making new article next time. Sahilaim (talk) 07:48, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: fails WP:NCORP, no coverage outside the company's own social media channels. I also note that Sahil Aim is the name of a DJ who has released music through this record label, so there may be a conflict of interest here. Richard3120 (talk) 12:51, 4 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.