Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The tale of the Trader and the jinn(1001 Nights)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to One Thousand and One Nights. Liz Read! Talk! 04:53, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

The tale of the Trader and the jinn(1001 Nights)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Seems to be just the tale, not an encyclopaedic article. Happy editing-- IAm Chaos  08:32, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  12:59, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to One Thousand and One Nights. — Sago tree spirit  (talk) 08:44, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:50, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep but it should be The tale of the trader and the jinn (1001 Nights) or just The tale of the trader and the jinn. The template on the 1001 nights article lists several of the best known tales from this important work, so that I do not see why we should not have another.  Certainly not the best article, but no reason to delete it.  Yes, it is a work of fiction, but that is not a ground for deletion.  This would not be suitable for merging, as the target article is far too general and wide-ranging.  Peterkingiron (talk) 17:44, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep with suitable notices for concerned editors, who may wish to make contributions. While the content is improperly structured, it does not seem correct to remove the page entirely.Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 18:37, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to One Thousand and One Nights. AfD participants, please provide sources. Not generic advice, especially of a poor kind. TrangaBellam (talk) 06:23, 9 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.