Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The trials of Nikki Hill


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was KEEP. Rewritten, no activity on AfD. Renominate if desired. -Splash talk 23:57, 29 October 2005 (UTC) *This article reads like a publisher's blurb, I`m all for deletion if the author of this article can`t be bothered to write an article that meets minimum requirements. theroicalwater has written a decent article on the temp page with enough potential, deletion no longer necessatry imo --Isolani 13:53, 16 October 2005 (UTC) --Isolani 00:28, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Don't delete, but fix I'm very sorry, I created this page. I liked the book and I thought it'd be nice to create an aritcle. I didn't know I was violating copyright laws. I copied the book flap synopses, but I didn't know it was illegal. I can do my own synopses in my own knoweldge of reading the book. Sheesh! Don't be so harsh!!!Rhetoricalwater 15:30, 10 October 2005 (UTC), I'm the previous IP adress.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.